Data Protection in the United Kingdom

Transfer of personal data in the United Kingdom

Transfers of personal data by a controller or a processor to third countries outside of the United Kingdom are only permitted where the conditions laid down in the UK GDPR are met (Article 44).

The United Kingdom Government has the power to make an adequacy decision in respect of a third country under the UK GDPR (Article 45). This power is equivalent to the similar authorities granted to the EC has under the EU GDPR and involves the Secretary of State making a positive determination that the third country provides for adequate level of data protection, following which personal data may be freely transferred to that third country (Article 45(1)). 

The UK Data (Use and Access) Act ("DUA Act") provides flexibility for the Secretary of State to make “data bridge” determinations more autonomously where the new 'data protection test' is met. The DUA Act provides that, when approving transfers, the Secretary of State may also have regard to "any matter which the Secretary of State considers relevant, including the desirability of facilitating transfers of personal data to and from the UK". The DUA Act also allows the UK government to establish a blacklist of countries or territories where personal data transfers are restricted or prohibited. 

The United Kingdom Government adopted an adequacy decision for the UK Extension to the EU-US Data Privacy Framework, in which an adequate level of protection for personal data transferred from the UK to US companies that have joined the framework is ensured in accordance with UK GDPR Art. 45. 

Currently, the following countries or territories enjoy UK adequacy decisions (these have all essentially been 'rolled over' from the EU GDPR): Andorra, Argentina, Canada (with some exceptions), Switzerland, Faroe Islands, Guernsey, Israel, Isle of Man, Japan (with some exceptions), Jersey, Eastern Republic of Uruguay, United States (if certified under the UK Extension to the EU-US Data Privacy Framework), New Zealand and South Korea. The UK is also treating all EU and EEA Member States as adequate jurisdictions. 

Transfers to third countries are also permitted where appropriate safeguards have been provided by the controller or processor and on condition that enforceable data subject rights and effective legal remedies for the data subject are available (Article 46). The list of appropriate safeguards includes, amongst others, binding corporate rules and standard contractual clauses with additional safeguards to guarantee an essentially equivalent level of protection to data subject’s and their personal data1

The UK Information Commissioner has issued two sets of standard data protection clauses for restricted transfers which can be used as an appropriate safeguard:

  • The International data transfer agreement (IDTA)
  • The International data transfer addendum (Addendum)

The European Commission standard contractual clauses issued under the EU GDPR on 4 June 2021 are not valid on their own for restricted transfers under the UK GDPR but can be used with the Addendum as a valid transfer mechanism. 

To rely on these safeguards, the DUA Act introduces a 'data protection test', which replaces the test of essential equivalence (under the EU regime) with a new threshold that the third country offers safeguards that are “not materially lower than” the UK. 

Article 49 of the UK GDPR also includes a list of context specific derogations, permitting transfers to third countries where:

  • explicit informed consent has been obtained;
  • the transfer is necessary for the performance of a contract or the implementation of pre-contractual measures;
  • the transfer is necessary for the conclusion or performance of a contract concluded in the interests of the data subject between the controller and another natural or legal person;
  • the transfer is necessary for important reasons of public interest;
  • the transfer is necessary for the establishment, exercise or defence of legal claims;
  • the transfer is necessary in order to protect the vital interests of the data subject where consent cannot be obtained; or
  • the transfer is made from a register which according to domestic law is intended to provide information to the public, subject to certain conditions.

There is also a very limited derogation to transfer where no other mechanism is available and the transfer is necessary for the purposes of compelling legitimate interests of the controller which are not overridden by the interests and rights of the data subject; notification to the supervisory authority and the data subject is required if relying on this derogation.

Transfers demanded by courts, tribunals or administrative authorities of countries outside the United Kingdom (Article 48) are only recognised or enforceable (within the United Kingdom) where they are based on an international agreement such as a mutual legal assistance treaty in force between the requesting third country and the United Kingdom; a transfer in response to such requests where there is no other legal basis for transfer will infringe the UK GDPR.

Transfers from the EU to the UK

The UK is now a third country for the purposes of Chapter V of the EU GDPR. 

The EU has adopted an adequacy decisions in relation to the UK which allows personal data to flow freely from the EU to the UK. On 19 December 2025, the European Commission renewed the UK’s adequacy decision until 27 December 2031.

Footnotes

1. Following the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Data Protection Commissioner v. Facebook and Max Schrems case (the ‘Schrems II’ case)

Continue reading

  • no results

Previous topic
Back to top